Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 34
Filter
1.
BMC Cancer ; 23(1): 185, 2023 Feb 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2270235

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma, the most common primary malignant brain tumour in adults, is a highly vascular tumour characterised by abnormal angiogenesis. Additional mechanisms of tumour vascularisation have also been reported in glioblastoma, including the formation of tumour cell-derived vessels by vasculogenic mimicry (VM) or the transdifferentiation of tumour cells to endothelial cells. VM and endothelial transdifferentiation have frequently been reported as distinct processes, however, the use of both terms to describe a single process of vascularisation also occurs. Some overlapping characteristics have also been reported when identifying each process. We therefore aimed to determine the markers consistently attributed to VM and endothelial transdifferentiation in the glioblastoma literature. METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid Embase were searched for studies published between January 1999 and July 2021 that assessed VM or tumour to endothelial transdifferentiation in human glioblastoma. The online systematic review tool Covidence was used for screening and data extraction. Extracted data included type of tumour-derived vasculature reported, methods and techniques used, and markers investigated. Studies were grouped based on type of vasculature reported for further assessment. RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen of the 419 unique records identified were included for analysis. VM was reported in 64/113 studies, while tumour to endothelial transdifferentiation was reported in 16/113 studies. The remaining studies used both terms to describe a single process, did not define the process that occurred, or concluded that neither VM nor endothelial transdifferentiation occurred. Absence of CD34 and/or CD31 in vascular structures was the most common indicator of VM, while expression of CD34 and/or CD31, in addition to various other endothelial, stem cell or tumour cell markers, indicated tumour to endothelial transdifferentiation. CONCLUSION: Cells derived from tumour to endothelial transdifferentiation express typical endothelial markers including CD34 and CD31, while tumour cells contributing to VM lack CD34 and CD31 expression. Additional tumour markers are required to identify transdifferentiation in glioblastoma tissue, and this process requires further characterisation.


Subject(s)
Glioblastoma , Adult , Humans , Glioblastoma/pathology , Endothelial Cells/metabolism , Cell Transdifferentiation , Neovascularization, Pathologic/metabolism , Cell Differentiation , Biomarkers, Tumor
2.
BMC Neurol ; 22(1): 139, 2022 Apr 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2268723

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common aggressive malignant brain tumor. However, the molecular mechanism of glioblastoma formation is still poorly understood. To identify candidate genes that may be connected to glioma growth and development, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to construct a gene co-expression network between gene sets and clinical characteristics. We also explored the function of the key candidate gene. METHODS: Two GBM datasets were selected from GEO Datasets. The R language was used to identify differentially expressed genes. WGCNA was performed to construct a gene co-expression network in the GEO glioblastoma samples. A custom Venn diagram website was used to find the intersecting genes. The GEPIA website was applied for survival analysis to determine the significant gene, FUBP3. OS, DSS, and PFI analyses, based on the UCSC Cancer Genomics Browser, were performed to verify the significance of FUBP3. Immunohistochemistry was performed to evaluate the expression of FUBP3 in glioblastoma and adjacent normal tissue. KEGG and GO enrichment analyses were used to reveal possible functions of FUBP3. Microenvironment analysis was used to explore the relationship between FUBP3 and immune infiltration. Immunohistochemistry was performed to verify the results of the microenvironment analysis. RESULTS: GSE70231 and GSE108474 were selected from GEO Datasets, then 715 and 694 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from GSE70231 and GSE108474, respectively, were identified. We then performed weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and identified the most downregulated gene modules of GSE70231 and GSE108474, and 659 and 3915 module genes from GSE70231 and GSE108474, respectively, were selected. Five intersection genes (FUBP3, DAD1, CLIC1, ABR, and DNM1) were calculated by Venn diagram. FUBP3 was then identified as the only significant gene by survival analysis using the GEPIA website. OS, DSS, and PFI analyses verified the significance of FUBP3. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed FUBP3 expression in GBM and adjacent normal tissue. KEGG and GO analyses uncovered the possible function of FUBP3 in GBM. Tumor microenvironment analysis showed that FUBP3 may be connected to immune infiltration, and immunohistochemistry identified a positive correlation between immune cells (CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells, and macrophages) and FUBP3. CONCLUSION: FUBP3 is associated with immune surveillance in GBM, indicating that it has a great impact on GBM development and progression. Therefore, interventions involving FUBP3 and its regulatory pathway may be a new approach for GBM treatment.


Subject(s)
Glioblastoma , Biomarkers, Tumor , Chloride Channels/genetics , Computational Biology/methods , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/genetics , Glioblastoma/pathology , Humans , Prognosis , Transcription Factors/genetics , Tumor Microenvironment
3.
Radiat Oncol ; 17(1): 178, 2022 Nov 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2279092

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: This systematic review aims to synthesise the outcomes of different strategies of incorporating functional biological markers in the radiation therapy plans of patients with glioblastoma to support clinicians and further research. METHODS: The systematic review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021221021). A structured search for publications was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Study characteristics, intervention methodology and outcomes were extracted using Covidence. Data analysis focused on radiation therapy target volumes, toxicity, dose distributions, recurrence and survival mapped to functional image-guided radiotherapy interventions. RESULTS: There were 5733 citations screened, with 53 citations (n = 32 studies) meeting review criteria. Studies compared standard radiation therapy planning volumes with functional image-derived volumes (n = 20 studies), treated radiation therapy volumes with recurrences (n = 15 studies), the impact on current standard target delineations (n = 9 studies), treated functional volumes and survival (n = 8 studies), functionally guided dose escalation (n = 8 studies), radiomics (n = 4 studies) and optimal organ at risk sparing (n = 3 studies). The approaches to target outlining and dose escalation were heterogeneous. The analysis indicated an improvement in median overall survival of over two months compared with a historical control group. Simultaneous-integrated-boost dose escalation of 72-76 Gy in 30 fractions appeared to have an acceptable toxicity profile when delivered with inverse planning to a volume smaller than 100 cm[Formula: see text]. CONCLUSION: There was significant heterogeneity between the approaches taken by different study groups when implementing functional image-guided radiotherapy. It is recommended that functional imaging data be incorporated into the gross tumour volume with appropriate technology-specific margins used to create the clinical target volume when designing radiation therapy plans for patients with glioblastoma.


Subject(s)
Glioblastoma , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Humans , Glioblastoma/diagnostic imaging , Glioblastoma/radiotherapy , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Functional Neuroimaging
4.
Palliat Med ; 37(6): 834-843, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2228220

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with glioblastoma have a poor prognosis and treatment is palliative in nature from diagnosis. It is therefore critical that the benefits and burdens of treatments are clearly discussed with patients and caregivers. AIM: To explore experiences and preferences around glioblastoma treatment communication in patients, family caregivers and healthcare professionals. DESIGN: Qualitative design. A thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 15 adult patients with glioblastoma, 13 caregivers and 5 healthcare professionals were recruited from Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: (1) Communication practice and preferences. Risks and side-effects of anti-tumour treatments were explained clearly, with information layered and repeated. Treatment was often understood to be 'the only option'. Understanding the impact of side-effects could be enhanced, alongside information about support services. (2) What matters most. Patients/caregivers valued being well-supported by a trusted treatment team, feeling involved, having control and quality of life. Healthcare professionals similarly highlighted trust, maintaining independence and emotional support as key. (3) Decision-making. With limited treatment options, trust and control are crucial in decision-making. Patients ultimately prefer to follow healthcare professional advice but want to be involved, consider alternatives and voice what matters to them. (4) Impact of COVID-19. During the pandemic, greater efforts to maintain good communication were necessary. Negative impacts of COVID-19 were limited, caregivers appeared most disadvantaged by pandemic-related restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: In glioblastoma treatment communication, where prognosis is poor and treatmentwill not result in cure, building trusting relationships, maintaining a sense of control and being well-informed are identified as critical.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Glioblastoma , Adult , Humans , Caregivers/psychology , Glioblastoma/therapy , Quality of Life , Health Personnel , Communication , Qualitative Research
5.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(4)2023 Feb 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2227435

ABSTRACT

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a type of brain cancer that is typically very aggressive and difficult to treat. Glioblastoma cases have been reported to have increased during COVID-19. The mechanisms underlying this comorbidity, including genomic interactions, tumor differentiation, immune responses, and host defense, are not completely explained. Therefore, we intended to investigate the differentially expressed shared genes and therapeutic agents which are significant for these conditions by using in silico approaches. Gene expression datasets of GSE68848, GSE169158, and GSE4290 studies were collected and analyzed to identify the DEGs between the diseased and the control samples. Then, the ontology of the genes and the metabolic pathway enrichment analysis were carried out for the classified samples based on expression values. Protein-protein interactions (PPI) map were performed by STRING and fine-tuned by Cytoscape to screen the enriched gene module. In addition, the connectivity map was used for the prediction of potential drugs. As a result, 154 overexpressed and 234 under-expressed genes were identified as common DEGs. These genes were found to be significantly enriched in the pathways involved in viral diseases, NOD-like receptor signaling pathway, the cGMP-PKG signaling pathway, growth hormone synthesis, secretion, and action, the immune system, interferon signaling, and the neuronal system. STAT1, CXCL10, and SAMDL were screened out as the top 03 out of the top 10 most critical genes among the DEGs from the PPI network. AZD-8055, methotrexate, and ruxolitinib were predicted to be the possible agents for the treatment. The current study identified significant key genes, common metabolic signaling networks, and therapeutic agents to improve our perception of the common mechanisms of GBM-COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Gene Expression Profiling , Glioblastoma , Humans , Computational Biology , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Gene Regulatory Networks , Glioblastoma/complications , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Glioblastoma/metabolism , Protein Interaction Maps/genetics , Prognosis
6.
J Neurooncol ; 161(1): 67-76, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2174681

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and malignant primary brain tumor in adults with a median overall survival of only 14.6 months despite aggressive treatment. While immunotherapy has been successful in other cancers, its benefit has been proven elusive in GBM, mainly due to a markedly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. SARS-CoV-2 has been associated with the development of a pronounced central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory response when infecting different cells including astrocytes, endothelial cells, and microglia. While SARS-CoV2 entry factors have been described in different tissues, their presence and implication on GBM aggressiveness or microenvironment has not been studied on appropriate preclinical models. METHODS: We evaluated the presence of crucial SARS-CoV-2 entry factors: ACE2, TMPRSS2, and NRP1 in matched surgically-derived GBM tissue, cells lines, and organoids; as well as in human brain derived specimens using immunohistochemistry, confocal pixel line intensity quantification, and transcriptome analysis. RESULTS: We show that patient derived-GBM tissue and cell cultures express SARS-CoV2 entry factors, being NRP1 the most crucial facilitator of SARS-CoV-2 infection in GBM. Moreover, we demonstrate that, receptor expression remains present in our GBM organoids, making them an adequate model to study the effect of this virus in GBM for the potential development of viral therapies in the future. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the SARS-CoV-2 virus entry factors are expressed in primary tissues and organoid models and could be potentially utilized to study the susceptibility of GBM to this virus to target or modulate the tumor microenviroment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Glioblastoma , Adult , Humans , Glioblastoma/pathology , SARS-CoV-2 , RNA, Viral/metabolism , RNA, Viral/therapeutic use , Endothelial Cells/metabolism , Organoids/metabolism , Organoids/pathology , Tumor Microenvironment
8.
biorxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.12.29.522182

ABSTRACT

T-cells play a crucial role in the adaptive immune system by inducing an anti-tumour response, defending against pathogens, and maintaining tolerance against self-antigens, which has sparked interest in the development of T-cell-based vaccines and immunotherapies. Because screening antigens driving the T-cell response is currently low-throughput and laborious, computational methods for predicting CD8+ T-cell epitopes have emerged. However, most immunogenicity algorithms struggle to learn features of peptide immunogenicity from small datasets, suffer from HLA bias and are unable to reliably predict pathology-specific CD8+ T-cell epitopes. Therefore, we developed TRAP (T-cell recognition potential of HLA-I presented peptides), a robust deep learning platform for predicting CD8+ T-cell epitopes from MHC-I presented pathogenic and self-peptides. TRAP uses transfer learning, deep learning architecture and MHC binding information to make context-specific predictions of CD8+ T-cell epitopes. TRAP also detects low-confidence predictions for peptides that differ significantly from those in the training datasets to abstain from making incorrect predictions. To estimate the immunogenicity of pathogenic peptides with low-confidence predictions, we further developed a novel metric, RSAT (relative similarity to autoantigens and tumour-associated antigens), as a complementary to dissimilarity to self from cancer studies. We used TRAP to identify epitopes from glioblastoma patients as well as SARS-CoV-2 peptides, and it outperformed other algorithms in both cancer and pathogenic settings. Thus, this study presents a novel computational platform for accurately predicting CD8+ T-cell epitopes to foster a better understanding of antigen-specific T-cell response and the development of effective clinical therapeutics.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Learning Disabilities , Glioblastoma
10.
J Neurooncol ; 160(2): 361-374, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2116588

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Shorter hypofractionated radiation therapy (HF-RT) schedules may have radiobiological, patient convenience and healthcare resource advantages over conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CF-RT) in glioblastoma (GBM). We report outcomes of young, fit GBM patients treated with HF-RT and CF-RT during the COVID-19 pandemic, and a meta-analysis of HF-RT literature in this patient subgroup. METHODS: Hospital records of patients with IDH-wildtype GBM treated with HF-RT (50 Gy/20 fractions) and CF-RT (60 Gy/30 fractions) between January 2020 and September 2021 were reviewed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable analysis was performed using Cox regression analysis. A systematic search and meta-analysis of studies from January 2000 to January 2022 was performed. RESULTS: 41 patients were treated (HF-RT:15, CF-RT:26). For both HF-RT and CF-RT groups, median age was 58 years and 80-90% were ECOG 0-1. There were more methylated tumours in the HF-RT group. All patients received concurrent/adjuvant temozolomide. At 19.2 months median follow-up, median OS was 19.8 months and not-reached for HF-RT and CF-RT (p = 0.5), and median PFS was 7.7 and 5.8 months, respectively (p = 0.8). HF-RT or CF-RT did not influence OS/PFS on univariable analysis. Grade 3 radionecrosis rate was 6.7% and 7.7%, respectively. 15 of 1135 studies screened from a systematic search were eligible for meta-analysis. For studies involving temozolomide, pooled median OS and PFS with HF-RT were 17.5 and 9.9 months (927 and 862 patients). Studies using shortened HF-RT schedules reported 0-2% Grade 3 radionecrosis rates. CONCLUSION: HF-RT may offer equivalent outcomes and reduce treatment burden compared to CF-RT in young, fit GBM patients.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Glioblastoma , Humans , Middle Aged , Temozolomide/therapeutic use , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Glioblastoma/radiotherapy , Pandemics , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy
11.
J Neurooncol ; 158(3): 489-495, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1976838

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Terminated clinical trials are an inefficient use of financial, patient, and administrative resources. We reviewed ClinicalTrials.gov for completed and terminated clinical trials for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and compared reported characteristics of completed and terminated trials to identify factors associated with early trial termination. METHODS: ClinicalTrials.gov was queried to identify all completed and terminated GBM-related clinical trials. Trial characteristics were examined and the reason for trial termination was determined. Univariate analysis by Pearson's chi-square and a multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify independent predictors of early trial termination. RESULTS: We identified 886 completed and terminated GBM-related trials between 2003 and 2020. Of these, 175 (19.8%) were terminated prior to completion. The most common reason for termination was participant accrual difficulties, accounting for 63 (36.0%) terminated trials. Trial termination was associated with trials that reported a primary purpose of diagnosis relative to treatment (OR = 2.952, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Early termination of clinical trials investigating interventions for the treatment of GBM is associated with diagnostic trials relative to therapeutic trials. Patient accrual difficulties are the most commonly identified reason for early trial termination. Predictors of trial termination should be considered when designing GBM-related clinical trials to minimize the odds of early trial termination.


Subject(s)
Glioblastoma , Glioblastoma/therapy , Humans , Logistic Models , Research Design
12.
Acta Biomed ; 93(3): e2022067, 2022 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1924890

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 pandemic revolutionized the way in which cancer patients are treated worldwide. Regarding neuro-oncological patients, usually considered frail and with lower life-expectancy in respect to other oncological patients, the international scientific community had to urgently reorganize the treatment approach in order to minimize the risk of in-hospital contagious. For GBM patients, adjuvant treatments have been evaluated with even much more attention with regard to the expected efficacy. As a consequence, an hypofractioned radiotherapy regimen has been preferred in order to reduce the daily hospital accesses and, especially in pMGMT unmethylated patients, chemotherapy with Temozolomide was avoided. Here, we made a comprehensive evaluation of the neurooncological community suggestions regarding GBM treatment in the pre-vaccine era of COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Glioblastoma , Vaccines , Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Brain Neoplasms/therapy , Dacarbazine/adverse effects , Glioblastoma/radiotherapy , Hospitals , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccines/therapeutic use
13.
Dis Markers ; 2022: 8602068, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1896084

ABSTRACT

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a prevalent intracranial brain tumor associated with a high rate of recurrence and treatment difficulty. The prediction of novel molecular biomarkers through bioinformatics analysis may provide new clues into early detection and eventual treatment of GBM. Here, we used data from the GTEx and TCGA databases to identify 1923 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). GO and KEGG analyses indicated that DEGs were significantly enriched in immune response and coronavirus disease-COVID-19 pathways. Survival analyses revealed a significant correlation between high expression of C1R, CCL2, and TNFRSF1A in the coronavirus disease-COVID-19 pathway and the poor survival in GBM patients. Cell experiments indicated that the mRNA expression levels of C1R, CCL2, and TNFRSF1A in GBM cells were very high. Immune infiltration analysis revealed a significant difference in the proportion of immune cells in tumor and normal tissue, and the expression levels of C1R, CCL2, and TNFRSF1A were associated with immune cell infiltration of GBM. Additionally, the protein-protein interaction networks of C1R, CCL2, and TNFRSF1A involved a total of 65 nodes and 615 edges. These results suggest that C1R, CCL2, and TNFRSF1A may be used as molecular biomarkers of prognosis and immune infiltration in GBM patients in the future.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Chemokine CCL2 , Complement C1r , Glioblastoma , Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type I , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , COVID-19/genetics , Chemokine CCL2/genetics , Complement C1r/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Gene Regulatory Networks , Glioblastoma/diagnosis , Glioblastoma/pathology , Humans , Prognosis , Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type I/genetics
14.
Antiviral Res ; 203: 105342, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1850636

ABSTRACT

Despite the great success of the administered vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, the virus can still spread, as evidenced by the current circulation of the highly contagious Omicron variant. This emphasizes the additional need to develop effective antiviral countermeasures. In the context of early preclinical studies for antiviral assessment, robust cellular infection systems are required to screen drug libraries. In this study, we reported the implementation of a human glioblastoma cell line, stably expressing ACE2, in a SARS-CoV-2 cytopathic effect (CPE) reduction assay. These glioblastoma cells, designated as U87.ACE2+, expressed ACE2 and cathepsin B abundantly, but had low cellular levels of TMPRSS2 and cathepsin L. The U87.ACE2+ cells fused highly efficiently and quickly with SARS-CoV-2 spike expressing cells. Furthermore, upon infection with SARS-CoV-2 wild-type virus, the U87.ACE2+ cells displayed rapidly a clear CPE that resulted in complete cell lysis and destruction of the cell monolayer. By means of several readouts we showed that the U87.ACE2+ cells actively replicate SARS-CoV-2. Interestingly, the U87.ACE2+ cells could be successfully implemented in an MTS-based colorimetric CPE reduction assay, providing IC50 values for Remdesivir and Nirmatrelvir in the (low) nanomolar range. Lastly, the U87.ACE2+ cells were consistently permissive to all tested SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, including the current Omicron variant. Thus, ACE2 expressing glioblastoma cells are highly permissive to SARS-CoV-2 with productive viral replication and with the induction of a strong CPE that can be utilized in high-throughput screening platforms.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Glioblastoma , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cell Line , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , High-Throughput Screening Assays , Humans , Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2 , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/metabolism
15.
Front Immunol ; 13: 840785, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1809395

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection has placed health systems under excessive pressure and especially elderly people with cancer. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a malignant brain tumor with an increasing incidence in elderly individuals, and thereby GBM patients are a vulnerable population during the COVID-19 outbreak. Accumulating studies have implied that SARS-CoV-2 might invade the brain directly via coronavirus receptors. However, little is known about SARS-CoV-2 infection in the clinical development of GBM. Here, we explored the oncogenic roles of six coronavirus receptors (ACE2, DPP4, ANPEP, AXL, TMPRSS2, and ENPEP) in GBM using bioinformatics and experimental approaches. We found that ANPEP and ENPEP were significantly increased at both the mRNA and protein levels in GBM compared with normal brain tissue. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression analysis demonstrated that high expressions of ANPEP and ENPEP are associated with poor prognosis and survival. Moreover, all receptors are positively correlated with the immune infiltration levels of monocyte. Furthermore, we identified 245 genes between COVID-19 and coronavirus receptors-correlated genes in GBM and performed a thorough analysis of their protein-protein interaction network, functional signaling pathway and molecular process. Our work explores for the first time the association of coronavirus receptors with GBM and suggests ANPEP and ENPEP as potential therapeutic targets of GBM irrespective of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Glioblastoma , Aged , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 , Carcinogenesis , Glioblastoma/genetics , Humans , Pandemics , Receptors, Coronavirus , SARS-CoV-2
16.
biorxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.03.02.482639

ABSTRACT

The paper presents the effect of COVID-19 mRNA (Pfizer/BioNT) vaccine on in vitro glial cells of the brain studied by means of Raman spectroscopy and imaging.. The results obtained for human brain normal and tumor glial cells of astrocytes, astrocytoma, glioblastoma incubated with the Covid-19 mRNA vaccine Pfizer/BioNT vaccine show alterations in the reduction-oxidation pathways associated with Cytochrome c. We found that the Pfizer/BioNT vaccine down regulate the concentration of cytochrome c in mitochondria upon incubation with normal and tumorous glial cells. Concentration of oxidized form of cytochrome c in brain cells has been shown to decrease upon incubation the mRNA vaccine. Lower concentration of oxidized cytochrome c results in lower effectiveness of oxidative phosphorylation (respiration), reduced apoptosis and lessened ATP production. Alteration of Amide I concentration, which may reflect the decrease of mRNA adenine nucleotide translocator. Moreover, mRNA vaccine leads to alterations in biochemical composition of lipids that suggest the increasing role of signaling. mRNA vaccine produce statistically significant changes in cell nucleus due to histone alterations. The results obtained for mitochondria, lipid droplets, cytoplasm may suggest that COVID-19 mRNA (Pfizer/BioNT) vaccine reprograms immune responses. The observed alterations in biochemical profiles upon incubation with COVID-19 mRNA in the specific organelles of the glial cells are similar to those we observe for brain cancer vs grade of aggressiveness.


Subject(s)
Astrocytoma , Mental Disorders , Glioma , Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Glioblastoma , Brain Neoplasms
17.
biorxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.02.13.480238

ABSTRACT

Despite the great success of the administered vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, the virus can still spread, as evidenced by the current circulation of the highly contagious Omicron variant. This emphasizes the additional need to develop effective antiviral countermeasures. In the context of early preclinical studies for antiviral assessment, robust cellular infection systems are required to screen drug libraries. In this study, we reported the implementation of a human glioblastoma cell line, stably expressing ACE2, in a SARS-CoV-2 cytopathic effect (CPE) reduction assay. These glioblastoma cells, designated as U87.ACE2+, expressed ACE2 and cathepsin B abundantly, but had low cellular levels of TMPRSS2 and cathepsin L. The U87.ACE2+ cells fused highly efficiently and quickly with SARS-CoV-2 spike expressing cells. Furthermore, upon infection with SARS-CoV-2 wild-type virus, the U87.ACE2+ cells displayed rapidly a clear CPE that resulted in complete cell lysis and destruction of the cell monolayer. By means of several readouts we showed that the U87.ACE2+ cells actively replicate SARS-CoV-2. Interestingly, the U87.ACE2+ cells could be successfully implemented in an MTS-based colorimetric CPE reduction assay, providing IC50 values for Remdesivir in the low nanomolar range. Lastly, the U87.ACE2+ cells were consistently permissive to all tested SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, including the current Omicron variant. Thus, ACE2 expressing glioblastoma cells are highly permissive to SARS-CoV-2 with productive viral replication and with the induction of a strong CPE that can be utilized in high-throughput screening platforms.


Subject(s)
Glioblastoma
18.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 148(3): 599-608, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1527467

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cathepsin L (CTSL) is a kind of the SARS-entry-associated CoV-2's proteases, which plays a key role in the virus's entry into the cell and subsequent infection. We investigated the association between the expression level of CTSL and overall survival in Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients, to better understand the possible route and risks of new coronavirus infection for patients with GBM. METHODS: The expression level of CTSL in GBM was analyzed using TCGA and CGGA databases. The relationship between CTSL and immune infiltration levels was analyzed by means of the TIMER database. The impact of CTSL inhibitors on GBM biological activity was tested. RESULTS: The findings revealed that GBM tissues had higher CTSL expression levels than that of normal brain tissues, which was associated with a significantly lower survival rate in GBM patients. Meanwhile, the expression level of CTSL negatively correlated with purity, B cell and CD8+ T cell in GBM. CTSL inhibitor significantly reduced growth and induced mitochondrial apoptosis. CONCLUSION: According to the findings, CTSL acts as an independent prognostic factor and can be considered as promising therapeutic target for GBM.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , COVID-19/pathology , Cathepsin L/metabolism , Dipeptides/pharmacology , Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic/drug effects , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Glioblastoma/pathology , Apoptosis , COVID-19/enzymology , COVID-19/virology , Case-Control Studies , Cell Proliferation , Female , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Glioblastoma/enzymology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Survival Rate , Tumor Cells, Cultured , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
19.
Adv Drug Deliv Rev ; 181: 114033, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1520626

ABSTRACT

Neurosurgery as one of the most technologically demanding medical fields rapidly adapts the newest developments from multiple scientific disciplines for treating brain tumors. Despite half a century of clinical trials, survival for brain primary tumors such as glioblastoma (GBM), the most common primary brain cancer, or rare ones including primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), is dismal. Cancer therapy and research have currently shifted toward targeted approaches, and personalized therapies. The orchestration of novel and effective blood-brain barrier (BBB) drug delivery approaches, targeting of cancer cells and regulating tumor microenvironment including the immune system are the key themes of this review. As the global pandemic due to SARS-CoV-2 virus continues, neurosurgery and neuro-oncology must wrestle with the issues related to treatment-related immune dysfunction. The selection of chemotherapeutic treatments, even rare cases of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) that occur among immunocompromised people, and number of vaccinations they have to get are emerging as a new chapter for modern Nano neurosurgery.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/surgery , COVID-19/surgery , Neurosurgery/methods , Animals , Blood-Brain Barrier/surgery , Glioblastoma/surgery , Humans , Nanotechnology/methods , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Tumor Microenvironment/physiology
20.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(18)2021 Sep 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1470886

ABSTRACT

During the last decade, we have persistently addressed the question, "how can the innate immune system be used as a therapeutic tool to eliminate cancer?" A cancerous tumor harbors innate immune cells such as macrophages, which are held in the tumor-promoting M2 state by tumor-cell-released cytokines. We have discovered that these tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) are repolarized into the nitric oxide (NO)-generating tumoricidal M1 state by the dietary agent curcumin (CC), which also causes recruitment of activated natural killer (NK) cells and cytotoxic T (Tc) cells into the tumor, thereby eliminating cancer cells as well as cancer stem cells. Indications are that this process may be NO-dependent. Intriguingly, the maximum blood concentration of CC in mice never exceeds nanomolar levels. Thus, our results submit that even low, transient levels of curcumin in vivo are enough to cause repolarization of the TAM and recruitment NK cells as well as Tc cells to eliminate the tumor. We have observed this phenomenon in two cancer models, glioblastoma and cervical cancer. Therefore, this approach may yield a general strategy to fight cancer. Our mechanistic studies have so far implicated induction of STAT-1 in this M2→M1 switch, but further studies are needed to understand the involvement of other factors such as the lipid metabolites resolvins in the CC-evoked anticancer pathways.


Subject(s)
Curcumin/therapeutic use , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Neoplasms, Experimental/drug therapy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/drug therapy , Animals , Female , Glioblastoma/immunology , Glioblastoma/pathology , Humans , Killer Cells, Natural/immunology , Killer Cells, Natural/pathology , Mice , Neoplasms, Experimental/immunology , Neoplasms, Experimental/pathology , Nitric Oxide/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic/pathology , Tumor-Associated Macrophages/immunology , Tumor-Associated Macrophages/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/immunology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL